Skip to content
NorseRunes
Browse

The ættir

Runic alphabets were divided into groups. The division is ancient (it is marked with dots on bracteates of around AD 500), and it is the mechanism behind runic ciphers.

The Vadstena bracteate and the one from Mariedamm, both around AD 500, carry the full Elder Futhark with dots dividing it into three groups of eight, though the two were struck from the same die, so they are one witness rather than two. The Grumpan bracteate, a little later and damaged in places, shows the same division independently. That makes the grouping one of the few structural facts about the alphabet we can point to directly rather than infer.

The Younger Futhark keeps three groups, but with six, five and five runes rather than eight each. That matters practically: cryptic runes encode a character as a pair of numbers (which group, which position within it) drawn as branching twigs. Get the group sizes wrong and the cipher does not decode.

On “Freyr’s ætt”, “Hagal’s ætt” and “Tyr’s ætt”

The division into groups is ancient, and so are the names, but they belong to a different alphabet. Freys ætt, Hagals ætt and Týs ætt are attested Icelandic runological terms for the Younger Futhark’s groups of six, five and five; Cleasby and Vigfússon’s dictionary was recording Hagals-ætt as “the second part of the Runic alphabet” by 1874. What is modern is transferring those names onto the Elder Futhark’s three groups of eight. No source calls the first eight Elder Futhark runes “Freyr’s ætt”, and a chart that labels them so has borrowed Viking-Age terminology for a pre-Viking alphabet.